Rep. María Elvira Salazar, a U.S. Congresswoman representing Florida’s 27th district, used her Twitter account on February 11, 2026, to express support for stronger sanctions against the Cuban government and to advocate for election integrity legislation.
In a tweet posted at 01:19 UTC, Salazar wrote: “Orgullosa de estar junto a mis hermanos @RepCarlos y @MarioDB exigiendo sanciones firmes y cero lagunas que le den un salvavidas financiero a la dictadura cubana.
Las sanciones son para cortar los recursos del régimen y frenar su represión contra el pueblo de Cuba. Pedimos”. The post emphasized the need for strict sanctions aimed at cutting off resources to the Cuban regime and halting repression against its citizens. She tagged fellow representatives Carlos Gimenez and Mario Diaz-Balart in her message.
Shortly after, Salazar shared a follow-up tweet containing only a link: “https://t.co/oqJT9w9E15” (February 11, 2026).
Later that day at 15:31 UTC, Salazar addressed domestic policy concerns regarding election security. She stated: “A valid ID is required to open a bank account or rent a car. Voting should be no different.
That’s why I support the SAVE Act. It’s common-sense legislation that protects the integrity of our elections. Verifying identity safeguards lawful voters, deters fraud, and strengthens https://t.co/jURggBRYwy“.
The SAVE Act mentioned by Salazar refers to proposed federal legislation intended to require proof of citizenship when voting in federal elections. Supporters argue that such measures are necessary to prevent voter fraud and ensure only eligible citizens participate in elections.
The issue of U.S. sanctions against Cuba has been longstanding policy since the early 1960s. Lawmakers like Salazar have continued to push for strict enforcement as part of efforts to pressure the Cuban government on human rights issues and democratic reforms.
On election integrity, voter identification laws have been debated across many states and federally in recent years. Proponents say these laws protect against fraud and maintain public confidence in electoral outcomes; critics contend they may restrict access for certain groups of eligible voters.